Category: Main


draft post
Welcome gentle reader to to launch of WAR, the World Austerity Report. I am pleased to acclaim we enjoy the association of a group of very talented and dedicated editors. I take to opportunity to call on all activists of good will to bring many submissions of articles and essays to our editorial board as we endeavor to cover a broad range of topics even as our focus remains narrow and pointed.
Austerity must STOP.
Economic Prosperity may be had as soon as we demonstrate the Political Will to bring it forth.

I propose a few headers for serialized columns; Recipe for Economic Development, & American Revolution – 21st.Century Style

Now as I am hoping to whet your appetite it seems fitting to begin with “The Recipe”
Chained CPI got you down?
Tired of eating Cat Food?
Wishing you could afford Steak?
Do you wonder where is the political will to do a simple thing-
like raise the cap on the Social Security tax structure to keep the fund healthy?
How difficult is it to see that is the right move?

“How to cook up an Economic Recovery; The Recipe”

So First the sizzle as they say. Are you like me, do you love a good Steak? I enjoy a nice red sirloin when I can afford it but often I purchase the Round Steak when the budget permits. What about that other beef, the Chuck Steak, though stuff if you treat it as a sirloin. My Grand Mother feed me a lot of Cube Steak, kinda’ the same thing but she always made it taste good with a light brown sauce. There are delicious meals to be had with the non-sirloin beef cuts at the market and when cost for the budget is an issue you may want to know about this one particular meal I enjoyed when I was young.

1) File under Beef – Full Meal – Oven

2) The challenge is: Chuck Roast dinner with Potatoes, Onions, and Carrots.
(Well if it is not a challenge, why bother)
I.E. “it did not turn out like I expected” 😦

Many will say the source definition of the word “recipe” is go get, or gather together, so it IS a list but not just a list. When I write down a Recipe I often format it with the intention of having it go into someone’s recipe box. Some folks like to have the origin of the dish or the context of the cuisine at the top. I however like to list that Third but I also like to make it personal.

3) From a fellow born (1960) in a Massachusetts seacoast town who learned it from his Mom who’s parents in turn were French-Canadian emigrants.

The Forth thing I like to set is a synopsis of both the equipment employed and/or the philosophy employed. Very important to some people!

4) The classic oval enameled roasting pan with cover. Hot Air Roasting with no water, with bone in roast Rubbed with Salt. After 30-45min at 375 degrees add 1/8 to 1/4 (size of pan) of a cup of water, Just to keep the drippings from burning.

There it is, That’s the secret to this meal. Quite a meal it is too, but add water too soon and too much and you wasted your time.

5) Recipe
Bone in Chuck Roast, thicker the better, 2 in. if you can get it.
Potatoes peeled or not
Carrots chopped or not
Onions (this is the best part) whole or in half
Salt perhaps as much as 1/3 of a cup or more

6) Roast at 375 degrees, meat only open/no cover full hour at least;
-add just a little water at 30-45 min. 1/8 cup if needed, less
-add vegetables placing Onions atop the roast
-check again 60-75min to add just a little water 1/8 cup if needed, less
-nibble an Onion
-at aprox. 80-95 add 1/8 or more cup water and cover for remainder
(slight steam pressure drives flavor back into the meat)
-if roast is large may keep in 2-1/2 hours
-pull meat and soft veg. out set aside to keep warm
-add water to pan perhaps as much, or less, to fill to 1/2 to 3/4 in. high
and on stove top boil the potatoes and recover meat drippings 10 min.,
longer if you want softer potatoes

Serve as platter meal at family table. If it comes out right you WILL KNOW IT, I Promise.
— recipe submitted by Al the Electrician

Well I’m not just an Economist ,, — Smarter than Joe the Plumber, ehy?

The word ‘recipe’ as we said, can be interpreted as go get, or gather together. So it is a list, that is the way we see them most often but a recipe needs to also describe method and technique. When cooks pass their recipes back and forth they change them a little each time. We are not afraid of too many cooks in the kitchen and when we are proud of our recipes we allow and welcome testing and modification.

I boast that I know how to generate a true and real economic prosperity, where to find all the needed ingredients and that all budget cuts are unnecessary and counter productive. Therefore when budget cuts kill it constitutes murder.

This introduction of “The Recipe” is intended to be spread as an invitation for discussion that can transform and reshape itself as the banter develops in the same fashion as the cooks and chefs would do their recipes.

There is a section of our population that is of particular risk. We at UFAA had recognized this during our founding conference back in October of 2012. We warned “Do not be fooled by the current rhetoric describing that any proposed changes to Medicare or Social Security will only effect programs of people below a certain specified age. I go on record, offering my personal perspective, telling you the elderly are in extreme danger and you must prepare now to defend them. I fear that if the people do not rally to protect the elderly the Nation may loose its soul. At the time you were not being told that the cuts proposed to Medicaid will hurt the most because that is how the nursing homes are funded. We made a call to action, no cuts are necessary and We are here to explain why and to tell what we can do instead. If our government were not in a state of hijack, it would be a simple matter of passing a bill to provide funding to Medicaid dispensations to people above a specified age expanded to provide for total needs, which makes sense because the total of our physical economy is bequeathed to us by all those gone before us. This means that the older ones among us have more right to its use than anyone else. The funding for this expenditure should come from revenue derived from Capital Gains Tax specifically because the piling up of monetary purchasing power garnered from the Capital Gains of financial instruments represent an extraction, a redistribution of wealth away from the people. A properly adjusted Capital Gains Tax commandeers this looting from the people back to the people and it is very moral to appropriate this to the elderly. Providing a boon to the geriatric care sector is a jobs program and since everyone gets old there is no playing favorites here. This is a description of something you should expect to see in a sane economy.

Alas, the government is in a state of hijack. The two majors parties are in a state of hijack. The banks are in a state of hijack. The news media is in a state of hijack, even the universities are in a state of hijack. So an increase in the Capital Gains tax rate is not (politically) doable, another way must be found. The means of funding must make sense to the broad majority of citizens and since we can not rely on party pundits or media outlets, we need to do this ourselves.

The answer we have came up with is a Transaction Tax on the quadrillion dollar turnover on Wall Street where presently no sales tax is levied at all. Let the popular name for this push be “The Wall Street Sales Tax”. The slogan “Stop The Cuts, Tax Wall St.”. Keep in mind this will have to be accomplished in a environment where the massive fraud and looting in the banking and investment sector has brought no prosecutorial response from government whatsoever. We warned “The austerity push is coming down the pike regardless of who is wining the Presidential election or wining the control of Congress”. “There is no time to loose, you must begin organizing now”, is what we agreed had to be said. Others will chime in and showcase the risk of other groups, the young for example. We will develop for you a step by step description of all the necessary ingredients for a full blast economic recovery.

Join in the banter. Let many chime in here and there, tweak the Recipe, make it your own. Pass it on to your children.

So in addition to a Letters to the Editor section,
we may set up a Letters to the Chefs section.

The Two Party System – Glass-Steagall

When you fail to educate a child you are destroying the potential of new wealth creation. The extremely asinine remarks of the type “I have no kids why should I have to pay for those kids to learn?” is or should be adequate grounds to laugh the fool out of the room, yet no one does, how bizarre.”?” For sure, in a responsible society an individual of such mental faculty would never be allowed near government never mind hold office, yet it occurs routinely and no one seams to mind. That one is assuredly short-sighted and the argument is strong that the young one improved by school does present a “value-added” of the kind where output far exceeds input. To answer the bonxxead’s question; because that is where all of tomorrow’s true wealth comes from you fuxx xxit! So it follows that WE all desire the control and funding of such an enterprise be done as locally as possible. On the other hand he may be on to something!; why should anyone have to pay to school a child at all anywhere? Since a legal tender monetary instrument (currency) is an authorization (ticket) to make use of some physical good or trade-able commodity, existent, should it not also be traded for that which is brought into being. In different terms, I pay you market value for something I need to use and not have to rob those of the fruits of their labor that brought that good into existence. Should those monetary instruments not also be extended as receipts for services rendered conveying that buying power to those contributing to the actual creation of new wealth?

As a population grows so must the quantity of its means of exchange units, therefor new currency must be emitted. Adding more beans in the bean pot, maintaining an equivalent buying power, past to future and preventing an increase of pressure to borrow. It is wise to fund the education system off balance sheet on a per capita basis of kids in classes as then there will be cash at the bank teller to facilitate the cashing of an increased number of paychecks. Local control need not be interfered with by the extension of new money to communities, no strings attached funding for education, reducing revenue needs at all levels of government. This is creating wealth and the buying power to make use of it at the same time. It also applies to the surplus of crops to the farmer, the first responsibility of any government, monetize the surplus, incentivize to make it happen. This is exactly how mankind got out of the stone age despite all the evils of money, or the love thereof.

Wealth and Buying Power are not exactly equivalent, but they do have a relationship. It is a thing easily measured, in this discussion of the re-distributed wealth, to know where BUYING POWER piles up. That buying power piling up is as a bleeding wound to the overall general economy, It is a control of wealth, argue not that wealth is distributed, argue that extreme monetary profits piling up anywhere are like air rushing out of the balloon, making less currency available in the other places. It can not be assumed that this buying power will be used by “job creators” for the public welfare in any way. This is why Capital Gains Tax should be high. When financial instruments create fictitious capital gains in the bubbles, those instruments then commandeer monetary instruments which intern commandeer though buying power the PHYSICAL wealth. With insufficient currency circulating borrowing costs rise and those with out the currency can not interact with the market. Labor is pressured to accept less remittance and competes for available jobs. Needful work goes undone lessening the physical surplus produced, in other words the food rots on the farm for lack of someone to buy it. When there is a need for additional currency, as the system operates now, the new monetary instruments are supplied by loans made at banks. The bank simultaneously writes one side of the ledger with a credit to the borrower and sets the value of the Promissory Note as an asset on the other side of the ledger, the bank need not possess the money that it is lending, this is new money from thin air. So as the system sits now only a few people get to decide where and when to augment the currency and none of them have anything to do with government.

The best place to reinsert the revenue from capital gains is health care for the most aged, because they are the ones alive that have contributed mostly to the sum total we realize in our economy. Funding bestowed thusly invigorates a special geriatric delivery of care but nurtures the whole of the heath care industry, now THAT’S creating Jobs.

Our Federal union has the power to by pass the FED by not borrowing, and emit currency in the form of loans in the role of Lender of First Resort for the long term and large scale projects of the FDR TVA type of get busy livin’ stuff we all want.

For these policies, and the so called”market forces” to work for us there are some things that need to be in place. They all function as do the cell membrane to protect the cytoplasm to the cells own use. I speak of firm currency exchange rate controls, like Breton Woods, intelligent and gentle Tariffs on imports goods AND services, and the Glass-Steagall partition with the FDIC only on one side.

But as it takes a Sovereign Nation-State Republic,,, Constitutional I might add, to do these things then I think we are at square one,
because ,, ,, ,,
,, ,, The two party system as now constituted is incapable of representing this view point effectively.

Best Regards
Alain Lareau

Glass-Steagall Jan-May 2011

January 26, 2011
“Limited Government” is the most expensive government of all

Breaking the Silence:
FCIC Report Brings the Focus Back to Wall Street

www.huffingtonpost.com

January 27, 2011
crisis was avoidable
blamed both Wall Street and government officials
for not spotting the warning signs

Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
Report on the Causes of 2008 Economic Crisis

www.c-span.org

February 15, 2011
establishment rebuke to freshman congressman and former lieutenant colonel Allen West’s
speech to close the Conservative Political Action Conference

Memo to Col. West: Beware of Glass-Steagall
www.nationalreview.com

February 22, 2011
conclusions
We conclude widespread failures in financial regulation and supervision proved devastating to the stability of the nation’s financial markets.
We conclude dramatic failures of corporate governance and risk management at many systemically important financial institutions were a key cause of this crisis.
We conclude a combination of excessive borrowing, risky investments, and lack of transparency put the financial system on a collision course with crisis.
We conclude the government was ill prepared for the crisis, and its inconsistent response added to the uncertainty and panic in the financial markets.
We conclude there was a systemic breakdown in accountability and ethics.

Phil Angelides on the
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report

blogs.kqed.org

March 1, 2011
began the process of assembling our trial evidence and witnesses,
including an expert witness to testify about the fraud we’d uncovered.
And then the strangest thing happened:

How this $83 fountain pen
helped save a family home from foreclosure

4closurefraud.org

March 4, 2011
millions of people have lost their homes to these criminals
– and CBS barely scratched the surface

Shocking and pervasive mortgage doc fraud
www.abovetopsecret.com

March 4, 2011
at least two cases still working their way through Florida’s courts, that delay
in disclosure apparently also meant that HSBC didn’t tell attorneys bringing foreclosure
actions in the bank’s name to put their cases on hold

What Do HSBC’s Foreclosure Moratorium
and Robo-Signing Claims Really Mean?

www.dailyfinance.com

March 9, 2011
can personally attest to the fact more than 1000 deeds
prepared by this firm were actually not signed by the named attorney

Another Maryland foreclosure mill accused of fraud-
Now it’s the Deeds

www.sourceoftitle.com

March 9, 2011
former notary from law firm Shapiro & Burson filed an affidavit
with law enforcement and regulators charging
that the attorneys’ signatures on the deeds and other important
documents were forgeries signed at the express direction of management

Foreclosure Fraud in Maryland:
Banks’ Lawyers Accused of Forging 1,000+ Deeds

www.dailyfinance.com

March 13, 2011
fraud upon the court:

Foreclosure Mills Continue Down the Wide Path of Destruction
dtc-systems.net

March 31, 2011
witness the fact that Russ Feingold, who voted against TARP,
lost his seat in the U.S. Senate to bailout-baby Ron Johnson

Jamie Dimon Worries That
Financial Regulation Will Doom Banks, Forever

www.huffingtonpost.com

April 5, 2011
the Daily Ticker

Our Debt Binge Is Ending
And The Middle Class Will Get Clobbered

finance.yahoo.com

April 6, 2011
all 50 state attorneys general are currently conducting an investigation
into the foreclosure mess–including cases that involve forged documents like these

60 Minutes:
Banksters Use Forgery Mills – SWAT Evicts Grandmother

cutdc.com

April 7, 2011
state attorneys general and multiple federal agencies had joined forces last year
are BETRAYED by Federal Reserve

Justice Denied:
How the Feds Are Caving to Wall Street on Foreclosures

www.bnet.com

April 8, 2011
copper plumbing had been stolen out of the house,
the windows were busted

Creepy Abandoned Mansions
realestate.yahoo.com

April 11, 2011
Michelle Rasmussen interviews
Birgitta Jonsdottir Icelandic Parliamentarian

April 11, 2011
Palm Coast, Fla., Las Vegas and Cape Coral, Fla.,
were all among the former high fliers

American Ghost Towns of the 21st Century
finance.yahoo.com

April 11, 2011 “instant short sale approvals” happening every day,
right now at the courthouse steps

Trustee Sale Auctions Drop Bids by 36%+
blog.foreclosures.com

April 12, 2011
mortgage servicers are being probed by a task force of 50 state attorneys general
over the way they foreclosed on overdue homeowners

BofA Chief Says More Foreclosures Inevitable
as Repeated Defaults Top 50%

www.bloomberg.com

April 13, 2011
same bankers who have been rescued with taxpayers money
are now speculating of food commodities

We are not awaking…
forum.davidicke.com

April 13, 2011
repeal certain provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
and revive the separation between commercial banking and the securities business

H.R. 1489, The Return to Prudent Banking Act of 2011
www.washingtonwatch.com

April 13, 2011
more than 20 original co-sponsors in introducing H.R. 1477

Representative Cummings and 23 Members Introduce
Preserving Homes and Communities Act of 2011

cummings.house.gov

April 14, 2011
639-page report on the financial crisis from the
Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations
singles out Washington Mutual for its decision to
champion its subprime lending business, even as executives
privately acknowledged that a housing bubble was about to burst

Well Aware Of Bubble, WaMu Boosted Bad Loans,
Report Finds

www.huffingtonpost.com

April 14, 2011
petitioners widget

The Latest Petition: Restore Glass-Steagall!

www.washingtonwatch.com

April 15, 2011
exhibit A of Wall Street’s evolution from a place that raises and deploys capital to worthy businesses into a vulturous creature that preys on unwitting investors

Goldman Sachs Ripped Off And Misled Clients,
Senate Report Says

www.huffingtonpost.com

April 15, 2011
customer banking should be strictly separated from investment banking

Jethro Tull’s Ian Anderson Is a Glass-Steagall Man
www.minyanville.com

April 15, 2011
60 percent of people who bought property as an investment last year paid in cash

Foreclosure Investors Flip Homes, Reap Rewards
www.huffingtonpost.com

April 18, 2011
comments on the Levin-Coburn report

Life after the repeal of Glass-Steagall
www.newappsblog.com

April 18, 2011
Some Florida Judges Begin to Crack Down on
“Fraud on the Court” in Foreclosure Cases

www.floridaforeclosuredefenselawyersblog.com

Apr 19, 2011
Hotspots with Max Keiser – Ireland (1/2)

whysetgoals.com

April 19, 2011
Washington’s Attorney General Finds Trustee Violations
www.floridaforeclosuredefenselawyersblog.com

April 20, 2011
who’s government is this

Wachovia Drug Money Laundering
www.youtube.com

April 21, 2011
Federal Regulators Closing in on a Settlement With Robo-Signers
www.floridaforeclosuredefenselawyersblog.com

April 25, 2011
Federal Government Orders 14 Mortgage Lenders to
Reimburse Homeowners Improperly Foreclosed Upon
www.floridaforeclosuredefenselawyersblog.com

April 26, 2011
PRESS RELEASE

LaRouche PAC Expands Fight
for Glass-Steagall Passage

www.larouchepub.com

April 27, 2011
institutions that receive deposits from the public
must be clearly prohibited from speculating on their own behalf
with the money of their depositors

UPI Editor at Large Outlines Crisis – Calls for Glass-Steagall
www.prlog.org

April 28, 2011
Finally, MERS Found to Have Failures
in Foreclosure Practices

www.floridaforeclosuredefenselawyersblog.com

April 28, 2011
Ventura County Teaparty

HR 1489 – Back to the Future With Glass-Steagall?
venturacountyteaparty.ning.com

April 28, 2011
members can vote on whether to approve the proposed bailout of Portugal

Mass Strike Surges Through Finland; Could Overturn “Euro” Slave Farm
concen.org

April 29, 2011
Florida Military Member Returns from Deployment
to Find Home in Foreclosure

www.floridaforeclosuredefenselawyersblog.com

May 1, 2011
a blog

Glass-Steagall Act requires
separation of investment banking from chartered banking.
www.rickpotvin.com

May 3, 2011
proceedings of the Annual Shareholders Meeting
were delayed and disrupted for about an hour

Protesters Disrupt Wells Fargo Shareholder Meeting
– Demand Moratorium on Foreclosures

www.indybay.org

May 3, 2011
in the form of the Pinetree Shilling practice instituted
under the authority of the original Royal charter
of the original Massachusetts Bay Colony

The concept of Glass-Steagall and a Global Credit System
tristencosgroveblog.blogspot.com

May 4, 2011

larouchepac.com

May 4, 2011
The Devil’s Timeline

Derivatives: Darth Vader’s Revenge
siliconinvestor.advfn.com

May 4, 2011
Federal Judge Sanctions LPS for Fraud on the Court
www.floridaforeclosuredefenselawyersblog.com

May 4, 2011

larouchepac.com

May 6, 2011
homeowners” have stopped paying their mortgages,
and so they will SPEND all of that money in the U.S. economy instead

Deadbeat homeowners to “rescue” U.S. economy
www.bullionbullscanada.com

May 6, 2011
estimated that banks will take back more than
a million homes this year due to foreclosure

America’s homeless middle class
www.squattable.com

May 6, 2011
Florida Mortgage Executive Guilty of 14 Counts of Fraud
www.floridaforeclosuredefenselawyersblog.com

May 8, 2011
Washington Mutual Rewarded Employees
that Sold High Risk Loans

www.floridaforeclosuredefenselawyersblog.com

May 9, 2011
unlikely home values will reach a bottom this year

Home Values See Biggest Drop Since 2008
m.cnbc.com

May 9, 2011
home prices fell 3 percent in the first quarter and will drop
as much as 9 percent this year as foreclosures spread and unemployment remains

‘Underwater’ Homeowners Rise to 28 Percent: Zillow
preview.bloomberg.com

May 9, 2011
a blog

H.R. 1489: Return to Prudent Banking Act of 2011
economiccrisiswatch.blogspot.com

May 10, 2011
Foreclosure Mill Sued
for Alleged Participation in Kick Back Scheme

www.floridaforeclosuredefenselawyersblog.com

May 11, 2011
decline of the housing market shows few signs of letting up

10 Cities Where Home Prices Are Falling The Fastest:
Clear Capital

www.huffingtonpost.com

May 16, 2011
excesses that led to the original passage of the Glass-Steagall in 1933,
quickly re-emerged when it was repealed

Deregulating Glass-Steagall
www.rebelyid.com

May 17, 2011
THE ELISE RICHMOND SHOW
Conservatively Speaking

GLASS – STEAGALL
eliserichmond.com

May 27, 2011
what was left out was any mention of Glass-Steagall
and the fictitious value nature of derivatives

Alain Lareau on HBO’s Too Big To Fail
mainstreamnemesis.com

May 27, 2011
the Daily Ticker

The Risks Are Enormous:
Why Morgenson and Rosner Are So Worried

finance.yahoo.com

May 28, 2011
a blog

What Was The Glass-Steagall Act?
centurean2.wordpress.com

May 29, 2011
The Quiet Metamorphosis: How Derivatives Changed the ‘Business of Banking’

Recommended Reading in Financial Regulation:
Omarova on Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act

www.theconglomerate.org

May 29, 2011
levels of leverage achieved in the current centrally planned regime
is as bad as it ever was

Carl Icahn Confesses
That The “System Is Not Working Properly”,
Warns Of Another “Major Problem” Coming

runredhot.com

May 29, 2011
bigger than in ’07, are cooking their books to show profits

Crisis is Not Behind Us
www.youtube.com

May 30, 2011
trading derivatives and other securities really had nothing to do
with the underlying purpose of banking

The Good Banker
davisonsdoodle.wordpress.com

May 30, 2011
Lonny Wolf sidles in

U.S. historian-scholar Dennis Speed on Glass-Steagall
www.abetterworld.net

May 31, 2011
make sure we are fighting the right villain

Too Big to Fail: A Fascist Fairy Tale
thelineinthesand.net

The youtube comments have been shut off, post comments here.

Anti-Austerity Call: Wall Street Must Pay —–

NO AUSTERITY!

Grass Roots Response to Anti-Austerity Call: Wall Street Must Pay for the Depression – Not the American People!

Glass – Steagall 2010

January 21, 2010
“There was a reason why the law was passed and endured for almost seven decades.
There was massive speculation by banks with other people’s money.”

Welcome back, Glass-Steagall
money.cnn.com

January 26, 2010
MoxNewsDotCom report

How Loud Do Alarm Bells Have To Ring?
Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur

www.youtube.com

February 3, 2010
jobless wha-wahtery

This Is Unacceptable In America!
Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur

www.youtube.com

April 20, 2010
The Young Turks

Bill Clinton Admits “I Was Wrong”
www.youtube.com

May 6, 2010
one of six senators still in office who voted against repealing Glass-Steagall in 1999

Senate Liberals Push for Strict Financial Rules
dealbook.nytimes.com

May 18, 2010
“If Senator Grassley fails to support to the Glass-Steagall amendment,
that action by itself will signal to Iowans that he is on the side of
unbridled greed by Wall Street… ” U.S. Senate candidate, Tom Fiegen regarding
the Glass-Steagall Amendment (S.A. 3884)
to S.3217 Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010,

Pass Glass-Steagall Amendment (S.A. 3884)
www.dailykos.com

May 19, 2010
rush the process through in order to nullify the Cantwell-McCain amendment to Dodd’s financial ‘reform’ bill. Without that amendment, the bill doesn’t affect banksters AT ALL…it would call derivatives speculation illegal but provides ZERO consequences for the activity.

Breaking – Sen. Reid calls for vote to end debate TODAY at 2:00pm / Cantwell-McCain amendment to financial reform bill threatened
www.godlikeproductions.com

May 21, 2010
the U.S. Senate has yet to debate and vote on the Cantwell-McCain amendment
to the Dodd financial reform bill

Glass-Steagall Showdown Will Decide Your Future
www.larouchepub.com

June 11, 2010
An Appeal for a Two-Tier Banking System

Europe Will Go Under
Without Global Glass-Steagall

www.schillerinstitute.org

June 30, 2010
a critique of the financial reform legislation

The unsurprising failure of U.S. financial reform
www.pbs.org

July 3, 2010
big corporations without any government BECOME government

Glass-Steagall, Derivatives and Gold & Silver
www.youtube.com

July 7, 2010
two systems of justice, one for Wall Street
and one for Main Street, means no justice at all

2009 Mortgage Assignments – Over a Trillion Dollars – Sure There Were…
stopforeclosurefraud.com

August 20, 2010
eliminate due process for the homeowner

Homeowner fights foreclosure in lawsuit claiming documents are fraudulent
ssgoldstar.websitetoolbox.com

August 26, 2010
the fine? was only 110 million

US Bank Wachovia Caught Laundering Cartel Drug Money
– $378.4 BILLION

www.youtube.com

September 7, 2010
opponent of Barny Frank 2010
see the debate

Rachel Brown for Congress website
rachelforcongress.com

October 4, 2010
this mess is just starting, and as people realize how bad it is,
it very well may lead to a total collapse in the housing market

Is A 90 Day “Mortgage Meltdown” Foreclosure Moratorium
Imminent As The RoboSigning Scandal Goes Mainstream?

www.zerohedge.com

October 6, 2010
STEVE BROWN / The Dallas Morning News

Foreclosure moratorium would only put off pain,
housing analysts say
www.dallasnews.com

October 7, 2010
sloppy nature of the foreclosure process initiated
in some cases has been simply shocking

Blumenauer joins chorus demanding foreclosure moratorium
www.oregonlive.com

October 10, 2010
properties that have clear mortgage documentation will demand
a premium in price, therefore, the more mortgage and title questions
effect marketability, the more the median and average home price
is likely to go up

Foreclosure Moratorium –
What Does it Mean for the Housing Market?

www.creditwritedowns.com

October 12, 2010
the administration’s wariness of backing populist calls to halt evictions, which could undermine efforts to persuade skeptical voters that it rescued the economy from a complete meltdown

White House rejects foreclosure moratorium
www.reuters.com

October 14, 2010
WAKE UP

Same Person Forged Billions of Dollars Worth
of Mortgage Documents for Bank of America,
Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank and
Dozens of Other Lenders and Shells

wakeup2010.blogspot.com

October 15, 2010
Foreclosure attorney Lynn Szymoniak located numerous signatures
of “Linda Green” from pleadings filed in various courts.
StopForeclosureFraud.com has rounded up some examples
of “Linda Green’s” signatures in one image:

Same Person Forged Billions of Dollars Worth of Mortgage Documents for Bank of America, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank and Dozens of Other Lenders and Shells
60 minutes will run the story in SEVEN MONTHS
www.prisonplanet.com

October 16, 2010
Nevada, California and Florida

Foreclosure moratorium
takes center stage in battleground states

thehill.com

October 18, 2010
special chapter of bankruptcy should be created to fix the mortgage crisis
? to benefit who?

Why a Foreclosure Moratorium Is a Bad Idea
online.wsj.com

October 19, 2010
employees of Florida’s largest “foreclosure mill” were given jewelry,
cars and houses from the firm in exchange for altering and forging
key documents used to process foreclosures

Women testify to fraud, forgery at ‘foreclosure mill’
www.allbusiness.com

November 17, 2010

Who Profits?

November 30, 2010

There Is A WAR Being Waged Against
The Working Families Of America!
Sen Bernie Sanders

December 13, 2010
the servicers were not equipped to handle this problem

HAMP continues to underwhelm panel,
Treasury defends ‘new standard

www.housingwire.com

December 16, 2010
largest mortgage servicers froze foreclosures in October

Geithner:
National foreclosure moratorium would hurt house prices

www.housingwire.com

http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/users/brock/webdoc6.html

A MODEST

ENQUIRY

INTO THE

Nature and Necessity

OF A

PAPER-CURRENCY

THERE is no Science, the Study of which is more useful and commendable than the Knowledge of the true Interest of one’s Country; and perhaps there is no Kind of Learning more abstruse and intricate, more difficult to acquire in any Degree of Perfection than This, and therefore none more generally neglected. Hence it is, that we every Day find Men in Conversation contending warmly on some Point in Politicks, which, altho’ it may nearly concern them both, neither of them understand any more than they do each other.

Thus much by way of Apology for this present Enquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper Currency. And if any Thing I shall say, may be a Means of fixing a Subject that is now the chief Concern of my Countrymen, in a clearer Light, I shall have the Satisfaction of thinking my Time and Pains well employed.

To proceed, then,

There is a certain proportionate Quantity of Money requisite to carry on the Trade of a Country freely and currently; More than which would be of no Advantage in Trade, and Less, if much less, exceedingly detrimental to it.

This leads us to the following general Considerations.

First, A great Want of Money in any Trading Country, occasions Interest to be at a very high Rate. And here it may be observed, that it is impossible by any Laws to restrain Men from giving and receiving exhorbitant Interest, where Money is suitably scarce: For he that wants Money will find out Ways to give 10 per Cent. when he cannot have it for less, altho’ the Law forbids to take more than 6 per Cent. Now the Interest of Money being high is prejudicial to a Country several Ways: It makes Land bear a low Price, because few Men will lay out their Money in Land, when they can make a much greater Profit by lending it out upon Interest: And much less will Men be inclined to venture their Money at Sea, when they can, without Risque or Hazard, have a great and certain Profit by keeping it at home; thus Trade is discouraged. And if in two Neighbouring Countries the Traders of one, by Reason of a greater Plenty of Money, can borrow it to trade with at a lower Rate than the Traders of the other, they will infallibly have the Advantage, and get the greatest Part of that Trade into their own Hands; For he that trades with Money he hath borrowed at 8 or 10 per Cent. cannot hold Market with him that borrows his Money at 6 or 4. On the contrary, A plentiful Currency will occasion Interest to be low: And this will be an Inducement to many to lay out their Money in Lands, rather than put it out to Use, by which means Land will begin to rise in Value and bear a better Price: And at the same Time it will tend to enliven Trade exceedingly, because People will find more Profit in employing their Money that Way than in Usury; and many that understand Business very well, but have not a Stock sufficient of their own, will be encouraged to borrow Money; to trade with, when they can have it at a moderate Interest.

Secondly, Want of Money in a Country reduces the Price of that Part of its Produce which is used in Trade: Because Trade being discouraged by it as above, there is a much less Demand for that Produce. And this is another Reason why Land in such a Case will be low, especially where the Staple Commodity of the Country is the immediate Produce of the Land, because that Produce being low, fewer People find an Advantage in Husbandry, or the Improvement of Land. On the contrary, A Plentiful Currency will occasion the Trading Produce to bear a good Price: Because Trade being encouraged and advanced by it, there will be a much greater Demand for that Produce; which will be a great Encouragement of Husbandry, who probably might otherwise have Sought some more profitable Employment.

As we have already experienced how much the Increase of our Currency by what Paper Money has been made, has encouraged our Trade; particularly to instance only in one Article, Ship-Building; it may not be amiss to observe under this Head, what a great Advantage it must be to us as a Trading Country, that has Workmen and all the Materials proper for that Business within itself, to have Ship-Building as much as possible advanced: For every Ship that is built here for the English Merchants, gains the Province her clear Value in Gold and Silver, which must otherwise have been sent Home for Returns in her Stead; and likewise, every Ship built in and belonging to the Province, not only saves the Province her first Cost, but all the Freight, Wages and Provisions she ever makes or requires as long as she lasts; provided Care is taken to make This her Pay Port, and that she always takes Provisions with her for the whole Voyage, which may easily be done. And how considerable an Article this is yearly in our Favour, every one, the least acquainted with mercantile Affairs, must needs be sensible; for if we could not Build our selves, we must either purchase so many Vessels as we want from other Countries, or else Hire them to carry our Produce to Market, which would be more expensive than Purchasing, and on may other Accounts exceedingly to our Loss. Now as Trade in general will decline where there is not a plentiful Currency, so Ship-Building must certainly of Consequence decline where Trade is declining.

Thirdly, Want of Money in a Country discourages Labouring and Handicrafts Men (which are the chief Strength and Support of a People) from coming to settle in it, and induces many that were settled to leave the Country, and seek Entertainment and Employment in other Places, where they can be better paid. For what can be more disheartning to an industrious labouring Man, than this, that after he hath earned his Bread with the Sweat of his Brows, he must spend as much Time, and have near as much Fatigue in getting it, as he had to earn it. And nothing makes more bad Paymasters than a general Scarcity of Money. And here again is a Third Reason for Land’s bearing a low Price in such a Country, because Land always increases in Value in Proportion with the Increase of the People settling on it, there being so many more Buyers; and its Value will infallibly be diminished, if the Number of its Inhabitants diminish. On the contrary, A Plentiful Currency will encourage great Numbers of Labouring and Handicrafts Men to come and Settle in the Country, by the same Reason that a Want of it will discourage and drive them out. Now the more Inhabitants, the greater Demand for Land (as is said above) upon which it must necessarily rise in Value, and bear a better Price. The same may be said of the Value of House-Rent, which will be advanced for the same Reasons; and by the Increase of Trade and Riches People will be enabled to pay greater Rents. Now the Value of House-Rent rising, and Interest becoming low, many that in a Scarcity of Money practised Usury, will probably be more inclined to Building; which will likewise sensibly enliven Business in any Place; it being an Advantage not only to Brickmakers, Bricklayers, Masons, Carpenters, Joiners, Glaziers, and several other Trades immediately employed by Building, but likewise to Farmers, Brewers, Bakers, Taylors, Shoemakers, Shop-keepers, and in short to every one that they lay their Money out with.

Fourthly, Want of Money in such a Country as ours, occasions a greater Consumption of English and European Goods, in Proportion to the Number of the People, than there would otherwise be. Because Merchants and Traders by whom abundance of Artificers and labouring Men are employed, finding their other Affairs require what Money they can get into their hands, oblige those who work for them to take one half, or perhaps two thirds Goods in Pay. By this Means a greater Quantity of Goods are disposed of, and to a greater Value; because Working Men and their Families are thereby induced to be more profuse and extravagant in fine Apparel and the like, than they would if they were obliged to pay ready Money for such Things after they had earn’d and received it, or if such Goods were not imposed upon them, of which they can make no other Use: For such People cannot send the Goods they are paid with to a Foreign Market, without losing considerably by having them sold for less than they stand ’em in here; neither can they easily dispose of them at Home, because their Neighbours are generally supplied in the same Manner; But how unreasonable would it be, if some of those very Men who have been a Means of thus forcing People into unnecessary Expence, should be the first and most earnest in accusing them of Pride and Prodigalty. Now tho’ this extraordinary Consumption of Foreign Commodities may be a Profit to particular Men, yet the Country in general grows poorer by it apace. — On the contrary, As A plentiful Currency will occasion a less Consumption of European Goods, in Proportion to the Number of the People, so it will be a means of making the Balance of our Trade more equal than it now is, if it does not give it in our Favour because our own Produce will be encouraged at the same Time. And it is to be observed, that tho’ less Foreign Commodities are consumed in Proportion to the Number of People, yet this will be no Disadvantage to the Merchant, because the Number of People increasing, will occasion an increasing Demand of more Foreign Goods in the Whole.

Thus we have seen some of the many heavy Disadvantages a Country (especially such a Country as ours) must labour under, when it has not a sufficient Stock of running Cash to manage its Trade currently. And we have likewise seen some of the Advantages which accrue from having Money sufficient, or a Plentiful Currency.

The foregoing Paragraphs being well considered, we shall naturally be led to draw the following Conclusions with Regard to what Persons will probably be for or against Emitting a large Additional Sum of Paper Bills in this Province.

1. Since Men will always be powerfully influenced in their Opinions and Actions by what appears to be their particular Interest: Therefore all those, who wanting Courage to venture in Trade, now practise Lending Money on Security for exhorbitant Interest, which in a Scarcity of Money will be done notwithstanding the Law, I say all such will probably be against a large Addition to our present Stock of Paper Money; because a plentiful Currency will lower Interest, and make it common to lend on less Security.

2. All those who are Possessors of large Sums of Money, and are disposed to purchase Land, which is attended with a great and sure Advantage in a growing Country as this is; I say, the Interest of all such Men will encline them to oppose a large Addition to our Money. Because their Wealth is now continually increasing by the large Interest they receive, which will enable them (if they can keep Land from rising) to purchase More some time hence than they can at present; and in the mean time all Trade being discouraged, not only those who borrow of them, but the Common People in general will be impoverished, and consequently obliged to sell More Land for less Money than they will do at present. And yet, after such Men are possessed of as much Land as they can purchase, it will then be their Interest to have Money made Plentiful, because that will immediately make Land rise in Value in their Hands. Now it ought not to be wondered at, if People from the Knowledge of a Man’s Interest do sometimes make a true Guess at his Designs; for, Interest, they say, will not Lie.

3. Lawyers, and others concerned in Court Business, will probably many of them be against a plentiful Currency; because People in that Case will have less Occasion to run in Debt, and consequently less Occasion to go to Law and Sue one another for their Debts. Tho’ I know some even among these Gentlemen, that regard the Publick Good before their own apparent private Interest.

4. All those who are any way Dependants on such Persons as are above mentioned, whether as holding Offices, as Tenants, or as Debtors, must at least appear to be against a large Addition; because if they do not, they must sensibly feel their present Interest hurt. And besides these, there are, doubtless, many well-meaning Gentlemen and Others, who, without any immediate private Interest of their own in View, are against making such an Addition, thro’ an Opinion they may have of the Honesty and sound Judgment of some of their Friends that oppose it (perhaps for the Ends aforesaid), without having given it any thorough Consideration themselves. And thus it is no Wonder if there is a powerful Party on that Side. On the other Hand, Those who are Lovers of Trade, and delight to see Manufactures encouraged, will be for having a large Addition to our Currency: For they very well know, that People will have little Heart to advance Money in Trade, when what they can get is scarce sufficient to purchase Necessaries, and supply their Families with Provision. Much less will they lay it out in advancing new Manufactures; nor is it possible new Manufactures Should turn to any Account, where there is not Money to pay the Workmen, who are discouraged by being paid in Goods, because it is a great Disadvantage to them.

Again, Those who are truly for the Proprietor’s Interest (and have no separate Views of their own that are predominant) will be heartily for a large Addition: Because, as I have shewn above, Plenty of Money will for several Reasons make Land rise in Value exceedingly: And I appeal to those immediately concerned for the Proprietor in the Sale of his Lands, whether Land has not risen very much since the first Emission of what Paper Currency we now have, and even by its Means. Now we all know the Proprietary has great Quantities to sell.

And since a Plentiful Currency will be so great a Cause of advancing this Province in Trade and Riches, and increasing the Number of its People; which, tho’ it will not sensibly lessen the Inhabitants of Great Britain, will occasion a much greater Vent and Demand for their Commodities here; and allowing that the Crown is the more powerful for its Subjects increasing in Wealth and Number, I cannot think it the Interest of England to oppose us in making as great a Sum of Paper Money here, as we, who are the best Judges of our own Necessities, find convenient. And if I were not sensible that the Gentlemen of Trade in England, to whom we have already parted with our Silver and Gold, are misinformed of our Circumstances, and therefore endeavour to have our Currency stinted to what it now is, I should think the Government at Home had some Reasons for discouraging and impoverishing this Province, which we are not acquainted with.

It remains now that we enquire, Whether a large Addition to our Paper Currency will not make it sink in Value very much; And here it will be requisite that we first form just Notions of the Nature and Value of Money in general.

As Providence has so ordered it, that not only different Countries, but even different Parts of the same Country, have their peculiar most suitable Productions; and likewise that different Men have Genius’s adapted to Variety of different Arts and Manufactures, Therefore Commerce, or the Exchange of one Commodity or Manufacture for another, is highly convenient and beneficial to Mankind. As for Instance A may be skilful in the Art of making Cloth, and B understand the raising of Corn; A wants Corn, and B Cloth; upon which they make an Exchange with each other for as much as each has Occasion, to the mutual Advantage and Satisfaction of both.

But as it would be very tedious, if there were no other Way of general Dealing, but by an immediate Exchange of Commodities; because a Man that had Corn to dispose of, and wanted Cloth for it, might perhaps in his Search for a Chapman to deal with, meet with twenty People that had Cloth to dispose of, but wanted no Corn; and with twenty others that wanted his Corn, but had no Cloth to suit him with. To remedy such Inconveniences, and facilitate Exchange, men have invented MONEY, properly called a Medium of Exchange, because through or by its Means Labour is exchanged for Labour, or one Commodity for another. And whatever particular Thing Men have agreed to make this Medium of, whether Gold, Silver, Copper, or Tobacco; it is, to those who possess it (if they want any Thing) that very Thing which they want, because it will immediately procure it for them. It is Cloth to him that wants Cloth, and Corn to those that want Corn; and so of all other Necessaries, it is whatsoever it will procure. Thus he who had Corn to dispose of, and wanted to purchase Cloth with it, might sell his Corn for its Value in this general Medium, to one who wanted Corn but had no Cloth; and with this Medium he might purchase Cloth of him that wanted no Corn, but perhaps some other Thing, as Iron it may be, which this Medium will immediately procure, and so he may be said to have exchanged his Cloth for Iron; and thus the general Exchange is soon performed, to the Satisfaction of all Parties, with abundance of Facility.

For many Ages, those Parts of the World which are engaged in Commerce, have fixed upon Gold and Silver as the chief and most proper Materials for this Medium; they being in themselves valuable Metals for their Fineness, Beauty, and Scarcity. By these, particularly by Silver, it has been usual to value all Things else: But as Silver it self is no certain permanent Value, being worth more or less according to its Scarcity or Plenty, therefore it seems requisite to fix upon Something else, more proper to be made a Measure of Values, and this I take to be Labour.

By Labour may the Value of Silver be measured as well as other Things. As, Suppose one Man employed to raise Corn, while another is digging and refining Silver; at the Year’s End, or any other Period of Time, the compleat Produce of Corn, and that of Silver, are the natural Price of each other; and if one be twenty Bushels, and the other twenty Ounces, then an Ounce of that Silver is worth the Labour of raising a Bushel of that Corn. Now if by the Discovery of some nearer, more easy or plentiful Mines, a Man may get Forty Ounces of Silver as easily as formerly he did Twenty, and the same Labour is still required to raise Twenty Bushels of Corn, then Two Ounces of Silver will be worth no more than the same Labour of raising One Bushel of Corn, and that Bushel of Corn will be as cheap at two Ounces, as it was before at one; ceteris paribus.

Thus the Riches of a Country are to be valued by the Quantity of Labour its Inhabitants are able to purchase, and not by the Quantity of Silver and Gold they possess; which will purchase more or less Labour, and therefore is more or less valuable, as is said before, according to its Scarcity or Plenty. As those Metals have grown much more plentiful in Europe since the Discovery of America, so they have sunk in Value exceedingly; for, to instance in England, formerly one Penny of Silver was worth a Days Labour, but now it is hardly worth the sixth Part of a Days Labour; because not less than Six-pence will purchase the Labour of a Man for a Day in any Part of that Kingdom; which is wholly to be attributed to the much greater Plenty of Money now in England than formerly. And yet perhaps England is in Effect no richer now than at that Time; because as much Labour might be purchas’d or Work got done of almost any kind, for 100 then, as will now require or is now worth 600.

In the next Place let us consider the Nature of Banks emitting Bills of Credit, as they are at this Time used in Hamburgh, Amsterdam, London and Venice.

Those Places being Seats of vast Trade, and the Payment of great sums being for that Reason frequent, Bills of Credit are found very convenient in Business; because a great Sum is more easily counted in Them, lighter in Carriage, concealed in less Room, and therefore safer in Travelling or Laying up, and on many other Accounts they are very much valued. The Banks are the general Cashiers of all Gentlemen, Merchants, and great Traders in and about those Cities; there they deposit their Money, and may take out Bills to the Value, for which they can be certain to have Money again at the Bank at any Time: This gives the Bills a Credit; so that in England they are never less valuable than Money, and in Venice and Amsterdam they are generally worth more. And the Bankers always reserving Money in hand to answer more than the common Run of Demands (and some People constantly putting in while others are taking out) are able besides to lend large Sums, on good Security, to the Government or others, for a reasonable Interest, by which they are paid for their Care and Trouble; and the Money which otherwise would have lain dead in their Hands, is made to circulate again and thereby among the People: and thus the Running Cash of the Nation is as it were doubled; for all great Payments being made in Bills, Money in lower Trade becomes much more plentiful: And this is an exceeding great Advantage to a Trading Country, that is not over-stock’d with Gold and Silver.

As those who take Bills out of the Banks in Europe, put in Money for Security; so here, and in some of the neighbouring Provinces, we engage our Land. Which of these Methods will most effectually secure the Bills from actually sinking in Value, comes next to be considered.

Trade in general being nothing else but the Exchange of Labour for Labour, the Value of all Things is, as I have said before, most justly measured by Labour. Now suppose I put my Money into a Bank, and take out a Bill for the Value; if this Bill at the Time of my receiving it, would purchase me the Labour of one hundred Men for twenty Days; but some time after will only purchase the Labour of the same Number of Men for fifteen Days; it is plain the Bill has sunk in value one fourth Part. Now Silver and Gold being of no permanent Value; and as this Bill is founded on Money, and therefore to be esteemed as such, it may be that the Occasion of this Fall is the increasing Plenty of Gold and Silver, by which Money is one fourth Part less valuable than before, and therefore one fourth more is given of it for the same Quantity of Labour; and if Land is not become more plentiful by some proportionate Decrease of the People, one fourth Part more of Money is given for the same Quantity of Land, whereby it appears that it would have been more profitable to me to have laid that Money out in Land which I put into the Bank, than to place it there and take a Bill for it. And it is certain that the Value of Money has been continually sinking in England for several Ages past, because it has been continually increasing in Quantity. But if Bills could be taken out of a Bank in Europe on a Land Security, it is probable the Value of such Bills would be more certain and steady, because the Number of Inhabitants continue to be near the same in those Countries from Age to Age.

For as Bills issued upon Money Security are Money, so Bills issued upon Land, are in Effect Coined Land.

Therefore (to apply the Above to our own Circumstances) If Land in this Province was falling, or any way likely to fall, it would behove the Legislature most carefully to contrive how to prevent the Bills issued upon Land from falling with it. But as our People increase exceedingly, and will be further increased, as I have before shewn, by the Help of a large Addition to our Currency; and as Land in consequence is continually rising, So, in case no Bills are emitted but what are upon Land Security, the Money-Acts in every Part punctually enforced and executed, the Payments of Principal and Interest being duly and strictly required, and the Principal bona fide sunk according to Law, it is absolutely impossible such Bills should ever sink below their first Value, or below the Value of the Land on which they are founded. In short, there is so little Danger of their sinking that they would certainly rise as the Land rises, if they were not emitted in a proper Manner for preventing it; that is, by providing in the Act That Payment may be made, either in those Bills, or in any other Bills made current by any Act of the Legislature of this Province; and that the Interest, as it is received, may be again emitted in Discharge of Publick Debts; whereby circulating it returns again into the Hands of the Borrowers, and becomes Part of their future Payments; and thus as it is likely there will not be any Difficulty for want of Bills to pay the Office, they are hereby kept from rising above their first Value; For else, supposing there should be emitted upon mortgaged Land its full present Value in Bills; as in the Banks in Europe the full value of the Money deposited is given our in Bills; and supposing the Office would take nothing but the same Sum in those Bills in Discharge of the Land; as in the Banks aforesaid, the same Sum in their Bills must be brought in, in order to receive out the Money: In such Case the Bills would most surely rise in Value as the Land rises; as certain as the Bank Bills founded on Money would fall if that Money was falling. Thus if I were to mortgage to a Loan-Office, or Bank, a Parcel of Land now valued at 100 in Silver, and receive for it the like Sum in Bills, to be paid in again at the Expiration of a certain Term of Years; before which, my Land rising in Value becomes worth 150 in Silver: ‘Tis plain, that if I have not these Bills in Possession, and the Office will take nothing but these Bills, or else what it is now become worth in Silver, in Discharge of my Land; I say it appears plain, that those Bills will now be worth 150 in Silver to the Possessor; and if I can purchase them for less, in order to redeem my Land, I shall by so much be a Gainer.

I need not say any Thing to convince the Judicious that our Bills have not yet sunk, tho’ there is and has been some Difference between them and Silver; because it is evident that that Difference is occasioned by the Scarcity of the latter, which is now become a Merchandize, rising and falling, like other Commodities, as there is a greater or less Demand for it, or as it is more or less Plenty.

Yet farther, in order to make a true Estimate of the Value of Money, we must distinguish between Money as it is Bullion, which is Merchandize, and as by being coin’d it is made a Currency: For its Value as a Merchandize, and its Value as a Currency, are two distinct Things; and each may possibly rise and fall in some Degree independent of the other. Thus if the Quantity of Bullion increases in a Country, it will proportionably decrease in Value; but if at the same Time the Quantity of current Coin should decrease, (supposing Payments may not be made in Bullion) what Coin there is will rise in Value as a Currency, i.e. People will give more Labour in Manufactures for a certain Sum of ready Money.

In the same Manner must we consider a Paper Currency founded on Land; as it is Land, and as it is a Currency

Money as Bullion, or as Land, is valuable by so much Labour as it costs to procure that Bullion or Land.

Money, as a Currency, has an Additional Value by so much Time and Labour as it saves in the Exchange of Commodities.

If, as a Currency, it saves one Fourth Part of the Time and Labour of a Country; it has, on that Account, one Fourth added to its original Value.

When there is no Money in a Country, all Commerce must be by Exchange. Now if it takes one fourth Part of the Time and Labour of a Country, to exchange or get their Commodities exchanged; then, in computing their Value, that Labour of Exchanging must be added to the Labour of manufacturing those Commodities: But if that Time or Labour is saved by introducing Money sufficient, then the additional Value on Account of the Labour of Exchanging must be abated, and Things sold for only the Value of the Labour in making them; because the People may now in the same Time make one Fourth more in Quantity of Manufactures than they could before.

From these Considerations it may be gathered, that in all the Degrees between having no Money in a Country, and Money sufficient for the Trade, it will rise and fall in Value as a Currency, in Proportion to the Decrease or Increase of its Quantity: and if there may be at some Time more than enough, the Overplus will have no Effect towards making the Currency, as a Currency, of less value than when there was but enough; because such Overplus will not be used in Trade, but be some other way disposed of.

If we enquire, How much per Cent. Interest ought to be required upon the Loan of these Bills; we must consider what is the Natural Standard of Usury: And this appears to be, where the Security is undoubted, at least the Rent of so much Land as the Money lent will buy: For it cannot be expected that any Man will lend his Money for less than it would fetch him in as Rent if he laid it out in Land, which is the mose [most] secure Property in the World. But if the Security is casual, then a kind of Ensurance must be enterwoven with the simple natural Interest, which may advance the Usury very conscionably to any height below the Principal it self. Now among us, if the Value of Land is twenty Years Purchase, Five per Cent. is the just Rate of Interest for Money lent on undoubted Security. Yet if Money grows scarce in a Country, it becomes more difficult for People to make punctual Payments of what they borrow, Money being hard to be raised; likewise Trade being discouraged, and Business impeded for want of a Currency, abundance of People must be in declining Circumstances, and by these Means Security is more precarious than where Money is plenty. On such Accounts it is no wonder if People ask a greater Interest for their Money than the natural Interest; and what is above is to be look’d upon as a kind of Premium for the Ensurance of those Uncertainties, as they are greater or less. Thus we always see, that where Money is scarce, Interest is high, and low where it is plenty. Now it is certainly the Advantage of a Country to make Interest as low as possible, as I have already shewn; and this can be done no other way than by making Money plentiful. And since, in Emitting Paper Money among us, the Office has the best of Security, the Titles to the Land being all skilfully and strictly examined and ascertained; and as it is only permitting the People by Law to coin their own Land, which costs the Government nothing, the Interest being more than enough to pay the charges of Printing, Officers Fees, &c. I cannot see any good Reason why Four per Cent. to the Loan-Office should not be thought fully sufficient. As a low Interest may incline more to take Money out, it will become more plentiful in Trade; and this may bring down the common Usury, in which Security is more dubious, to the Pitch it is determined at by Law.

If it should be objected, That the Emitting It at so low an Interest, and on such easy Terms, will occasion more to be taken out than the Trade of the Country really requires: It may be answered, That, as has already been shewn, there can never be so much of it emitted as to make it fall below the Land it is founded on; because no Man in his Senses will mortgage his Estate for what is of no more Value to him than That he has mortgaged, especially if the Possession of what he receives is more precarious than of what he mortgages, as that of Paper Money is when compared to Land: And if it should ever become so plenty by indiscreet Persons continuing to take out a large Overplus, above what is necessary in Trade, so as to make People imagine it would become by that Means of less Value than their mortgaged Lands, they would immediately of Course begin to pay it in again to the Office to redeem their Land, and continue to do so till there was no more left in Trade than was absolutely necessary. And thus the Proportion would find it self, (tho’ there were a Million too much in the Office to be let out) without giving any one the Trouble of Calculation.

It may perhaps be objected to what I have written concerning the Advantages of a large Addition to our Currency, That if the People of this Province increase, and Husbandry is more followed, we shall overstock the Markets with our Produce of Flower, &c. To this it may be answered, that we can never have too many People (nor too much Money) For when one Branch of Trade or Business is overstocked with Hands, there are the more to spare to be employed in another. So if raising Wheat proves dull, more may (if there is Money to support and carry on new Manufactures) proceed to the raising and manufacturing of Hemp, Silk, Iron and many other Things the Country is very capable of, for which we only want People to work, and Money to pay them with.

Upon the Whole it may be observed, That it is the highest Interest of a Trading Country in general to make Money plentiful; and that it can be a Disadvantage to none that have honest Designs. It cannot hurt even the Usurers, tho’ it should sink what they receive as Interest; because they will be proportionably more secure in what they lend; or they will have an Opportunity of employing their Money to greater Advantage, to themselves as well as to the Country. Neither can it hurt those Merchants who have great Sums out-standing in Debts in the Country, and seem on that Account to have the most plausible Reason to fear it; to wit, because a large Addition being made to our Currency, will increase the Demand of our Exporting Produce, and by that Means raise the Price of it, so that they will not be able to purchase so much Bread and Flower with 100 when they shall receive it after such an Addition, as they now can, and may if there is no Addition: I say it cannot hurt even such, because they will get in their Debts just in exact Proportion so much the easier and sooner as the Money becomes plentier; and therefore, considering the Interest and Trouble saved, they will not be Losers; because it only sinks in Value as a Currency, proportionally as it becomes more plenty. It cannot hurt the Interest of Great Britain, as has been shewn; and it will greatly advance the Interest of the Proprietor. It will be an Advantage to every industrious Tradesman, &c. because his Business will be carried on more freely, and Trade be universally enlivened by it. And as more Business in all Manufactures will be done, by so much as the Labour and Time spent in Exchange is saved, the Country in general will grow so much the richer.

It is nothing to the Purpose to object the wretched Fall of the Bills in New-England and South-Carolina, unless it might be made evident that their Currency was emitted with the same Prudence, and on such good Security as ours is; and it certainly was not.

As this Essay is wrote and published in Haste, and the Subject in it self intricate, I hope I shall be censured with Candour, if, for want of Time carefully to revise what I have written, in some Places I should appear to have express’d my self too obscurely, and in others am liable to Objections I did not foresee. I sincerely desire to be acquainted with the Truth, and on that Account shall think my self obliged to any one, who will take the Pains to shew me, or the Publick, where I am mistaken in my Conclusions, And as we all know there are among us several Gentlemen of acute Parts and profound Learning, who are very much against any Addition to our Money, it were to be wished that they would favour the Country with their Sentiments on this Head in Print; which, supported with Truth and good Reasoning, may probably be very convincing. And this is to be desired the rather, because many People knowing the Abilities of those Gentlemen to manage a good Cause, are apt to construe their Silence in This, as an Argument of a bad One. Had any Thing of that Kind ever yet appeared, perhaps I should not have given the Publick this Trouble: But as those ingenious Gentlemen have not yet (and I doubt never will) think it worth their Concern to enlighten the Minds of their erring Countrymen in this Particular, I think it would be highly commendable in very one of us, more fully to bend our Minds to the Study of What is the true Interest of PENNSYLVANIA; whereby we may be enabled, not only to reason pertinently with one another; but, if Occasion requires, to transmit Home such clear Representations, as must inevitably convince our Superiors of the Reasonableness and Integrity of our Designs.

B. B.

Philadelphia, April 3, 1729.

The National Slate  The following statement was released by Congressional Candidate, Kesha Rogers of the 22nd district of Texas

The entire criminal operation that has turned our cities into slums, stolen our pensions, bankrupted our cities and states, and murdered our most vulnerable citizens, all in the name of “too big to fail”, has now been exposed as “LIBOR-gate”. Let us be clear: this is not an interest rate scandal; what is exposed is, all the hell you’ve been suffering for the past 5 years, since the 2007 collapse of the system and the 2008-2012 taxpayer bailouts, was planned, preventable, and entirely intentional. The highest elements of government and finance crossed party lines to form a bipartisan coalition to murder Americans.

LIBOR is the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, which is the interest rates banks offer to pay, when institutions buy their debt. 75% of major cities across the country purchased interest rate swaps, to “protect” themselves in case interest rates went up. But what has been revealed is that 16 major banks decided to rig the interest rates, and artificially lower them. Emails indicate that then-New York Federal Reserve Chair Timothy Geithner, in 2007, knew this was going on, and not only did nothing to stop it, but covered it up. When he became Obama’s Treasury Secretary, Geithner rewarded the banks that did it with taxpayer bailouts. The effect was that all these cities lost big money, while the bankers got their mortgage-backed securities, derivatives, credit default swaps, and other gambling debts bailed out with your tax dollars. Then the bankers foreclosed on you, demanded their contracts be paid, refused to lend, and said, “Your 401k has lost $150,000, so sorry.” All this while, the Bush and Obama administrations, working with the Federal Reserve, and Wall Street and European banks, knew the whole thing was a set up, from the very beginning. Instead of throwing these criminals in jail, our government held passed sham legislation, which did nothing to protect you.

This is the British Empire we have always talked about: using private ownership of money and debt, along with paid for politicians to enforce their laws, a financial-industrial cartel seeks to rule over nations and destroy our standard of living for their personal profit. Most Americans have known in their gut that we we’re being swindled by our leaders since the bailouts, but now the criminals are exposed in the court of human history.

– The Solution Is There, If You Fight For It –

There currently is no rule of law to prosecute this international crime spree. What is required is the immediate reinstatement of the original Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, now in Congress as H.R. 1489, with 71 cosponsors. Only Glass-Steagall will restore the rule of law outlined in the Preamble of our U.S. Constitution. As LIBOR-gate erupted, elements within the British oligarchy flipped, from calling Glass-Steagall “an act of war” to joining with LaRouche PAC in demanding its reinstatement. This call is coming in a period where we have reached the end of the system, just as Lyndon LaRouche warned, back in 2007. The breakdown of the trans-Atlantic system is well underway, and hyperinflation is looming. Even the British oligarchy has realized the disintegration of the banking system has reached a point of no return, and Glass-Steagall is now a matter of survival or extinction.

LIBOR-gate signals that the banking oligarchy, which funded Obama’s 2008 presidential bid, are now dumping him. This, combined with the Republican Party’s investigations into Fast and Furious and Wachovia/HSBC drug money laundering, and the Democratic Party’s attacks on Obama’s war crimes and human rights violations, opens the door for Obama to be dumped as the 2012 nominee for president, before the September Democratic National Convention.

With the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall, we will separate the fictitious gambling debt from the legitimate debt, refusing to pay any of the fictitious debt that is looting our cities and states, while protecting our community banks so they can lend for real productive jobs in industry and manufacturing. We must then institute a national system of credit, modeled on the first Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, for investing into long-term large scale scientific and technological projects such as NAWAPA XXI and manned space exploration, to increase our nation’s productivity in collaboration with sovereign nations throughout the world, including Russia and China, for advancements in human progress. This is the policy the national slate of LaRouche candidates is campaigning on.

Now is not the time to wait around and see if something will happen. Your survival depends on making it happen. Glass-Steagall is not an option; it is a necessity. It is time now for the American people to break with the bad trends in thinking that Wall Street’s degenerate leadership has corrupted our nation with for too long. It is time we commit ourselves to a greater mission of progress for those generations to come.

DRaymond

on Huffingtonpost wrote:

Neoconservatives have the Ayn Rand fueled fantasy that you can take a bunch of genius entrepreneurs, put them in an isolated valley completely cut off from the rest of the world, and that not only would the thrive but they would create some sort of super-nirvana while the rest of society collapsed from their absence.   It is an utter fantasy.  It is unlikely that separated from society these genius entrepreneurs could be able to grow their own food much less anything else.

Without Steve Wozniak and a whole ecosystem of parts suppliers Steve Jobs would have had nothing to sell.   Without advancements in metallurgy, machining and refining, not to mention improved roads, Henry Ford would have gone nowhere.  Without a strategic partnership with IBM and Intel and some technology licensed from Xerox Microsoft would be a maker of an obsolete BASIC compiler.

Every entrepreneur that doesn’t recognize the giants that he is standing on is an ego-maniacal fool.

Now I do understand the sentiment and agree with the premise but there is much more to be said, and the responses on Huffpost are limited, this is what I placed in answer:

“well yes, that could happen, but they must have the power to create their own currency, and protect it from outside attack, fund their own infrastructure, schools and health care, and establish and charter banks to service the public good,, ,, etc. etc. H.R.1489 The return to Prudent Banking Act

otherwise referred to AKA Glass-Steagall”

So if you will indulge me what would be the problem the hypothesized society encounter?
From a different HufingtonPost topic line I had posted:
“The common basic prevailing ignorance most people possess concerning economics, they fail to see if you were to double the food supply and the hungry people did not possess the means of exchange to purchase it, the food would rot on the farm. If someone provides a service, bestow to them the marker appropriate to the service rendered which becomes currency for further purchases even if you must create this marker out of thin air, especially if this provides for activity that would not otherwise occur. The markers so created have value because they associate with real value brought into existence. Fictitious capital gains of speculation do not. The issue everyone should have with TARP is that it extended bail-out credit to the BANKS ONLY as a debt instrument upon the public. It replaced one set of failed debt with another debt doomed to also fail.

Now here I must convey to you why I so staunchly support a return to the Glass-Steagall firewall.  It can be said that there are numerous varieties and types of monetary instruments.  To spend a lot of time explaining learning to categorize them would be an interesting affair but what is needed is only to partition the instruments into distinct flow paths to limit co-mingling and contamination.  What is the benefit of the partition is the definition of the subject at hand. This speaks to the missing context of the post by DRaymond. The subject at hand involves some required reading.

I will end this with an invitation for more discussion and refer to the suggested material as I did in an article critiquing the HBO movie Too Big To Fail beginning May 26, 2011;

A few days prior to my sitting and writing out this little essay I became aware of a scheduled showing of a HBO special called TOO BIG TO FAIL. I was impressed by the hub-bub this show was generating so I stayed up late and viewed the program and found it very entertaining. I do not mean that it a snide way, it is a serious subject. What I enjoyed most I think is that the actors involved demonstrated some sufficient competence in dealing with the subject matter, equivalent to what I think is reasonably expected of the general public. For clarity, the HBO program is not complete, there is much more to tell. The actors in dealing with the development of their characters learned more of value in that process than they would have had they matriculated an MBA curriculum at university or business school. There are indeed some half truths and particular damage control aspects in the show sufficient to cry fowl, cover up continues etc.

The point?,
well overall, it is a good benchmark, it proves that the average joe no longer has the excuse of claiming ” oh all that crap is too complicated, that hurts my head, it’s all mumbo jumbo, etc.” I can not over stress the importance of this. It is in fact the primary reason I am writing this. Far too few Americans, still today do not even have the willingness to explore the subject or attempt an understanding of the case comparable to what these actors have achieved. The public awareness must go well beyond this benchmark if we are to survive as a nation. So for the record what was left out was any mention of Glass-Steagall and the fictitious value nature of derivatives, that’s just for starters.

June 2, 2011

What is the moral of the story? The danger remains, TARP solved nothing, what occurred was a sequence of stop gap measures, each called into place because the previous was insufficient, what comes after QE2, to big to fail can happen again! Moreover it can be justifiably stated that the whole mess was a swindle. If we wish to continue the questions beyond the context of the HBO show we can, where are the jobs, will the foreclosures ever stop, are we prepared to handle what comes next? From where I sit I see that the willingness to tolerate a such thing as derivatives in the first place underscores the incompetence of all those involved, unless you want to say it is all deliberate in which case then you have to come to grips with their being pure evil, the Banksters I mean. The drama of the HBO special helps us grapple with this, is it an either or distinction, we can look at the human element, poor Hank he did his best etc., what is it in these people’s heads that keeps them from thinking outside the box even as they believe they are thinking outside the box but failing. Failing in the sense that nothing is really solved just postponed! That is if you believe the story line, if not then you must admit that their efforts were a great success, for them I mean.

The time scope of TOO BIG TO FAIL spans from the outset of the “mortgage meltdown” as it hammered Bear Sterns up to the passing of the second round of TARP legislation and the cash infusion with preferred stock purchases of the large banks. Can you agree that my description of this sequence period as the tip of the iceberg be nothing less than an understatement? I think this is a well placed metaphor because it is meant to focus the eye on the unseen, exactly what we want to discuss. There are lots of names to throw about, shadow banking, the most popular, I’m guessing. Broadening the scope would require that many things be brought into the light so to speak, all that crazy lingo, when they say mark up don’t they really mean mark down. Thing like this have the potential to truly waste our time but one thing we could spend our time on well is to define Value. I trust you will discovery why I deem this important that I bring it up first; a list of terms.

  • facility of conveyance value
  • placeholder value
  • nominal value
  • fictitious value

Delving into the way Wall St. defines value may require a strong stomach. Many variations of perceived value should be added to this list and I propose it useful that we team up and take a stab at debunking them one by one. For now I wish to use the idea of value to get at something else of great importance.

Consider the Farmer, ,, no consider yourself a Farmer, you work, you get results to your benefit, your produce. The work you do has a value because of it’s result, it keeps you alive. Food is food after all. Suppose you wanted to make a living as a Train Robber, the work you do has a value directly relative to the result you get, but its a crap shoot isn’t it? You may get killed, no profit there, you may kill others then your a wanted man not just for train robbin’ that has a cost. You may get a lot of loot and not have to rob a train ever again, or you get just enough to get by for a specific period of time and your work, if you can call it that, has value to you relative to the time that goes by before you feel the need to bust a train again. Let’s not forget, one more possible case, everything could go right but there were only poor people on the train that day and all you effort is for nothing, wasted your time. What value does your work have then? Ok, go back to being a Farmer, that is a gamble too in many ways, there are costs and ROI can fluctuate year by year, I get that but there is a specific difference between the two. Do you see it, the only real distinction? Regardless of how successful (or not) the Train Robber is there are only inputs and output for he himself. He never creates a thing extra or causes anything extra to come into existence. The Farmer on the other hand can reap a plenty more than he himself can use.

The central issue I hope you would examine is the distinction between Physical profit and Monetary (fiscal) profit. One keeps you alive the other does not. At the beginning of an undertaking one could take account of the resources available to do the job and after a measurable segment of the process one could again take account. To be clear I do not mean a statistical analysis but rather a study of a dynamic process gauged by the intent involved and informed by intent of what to measure and how to measure it. If then after the completion of a portion of an endeavor one could measure an increase in money but yet a decrease in FOOD, WATER, ENERGY it can be said what did we win? What can we buy now that there is less of the things we want even though we have more money to buy it with? This is not an over simplification but a principle that helps us have clarity about what we want to measure and what measuring sticks we are going to employ to determine if we have success in reaching the goal.


What is the goal?

June 15, 2011

Thus far we have introduced several interconnected notions, the first being the agreed estimate that far too few Americans understand the events that lead to the 2008 Meltdown and far too few Americans know the truth about what occurred around the TARP episode in that it was an attempt of the swindlers to save themselves AS SWINDLERS. They (the swindlers) failed to remove the threat, if you believe they ever intended to. The point that the HBO Too Big To Fail tele-drama, while a cover up in itself, is a distinct BENCHMARK that represents a limited understanding of which no American Citizen can be allowed to claim ignorance to or to be let off the hook in the realm of civic responsibility for action is a useful focus. That to save the Nation in these days now the average American must achieve insight and competence far beyond the time frame of this silly TV show, regardless of how entertaining it is to see poor Hank twisting in the wind so dramatized. we seek your assistance in this. To what end? In the near term help the Average Joe, John and Joan Q. Public see the clear need for the reestablishment of the Glass-Steagall Firewall to stop the bleeding or take the poison out.

My request to you is fight now for Glass-Steagall. Might I start by suggesting that in the US, having a wealthy elite social sector is not a bad thing, provided we tolerate no Royalty and heredity transmission of public office, including the fascist counterpart. What is the great sin? Is it the gluttony, the lavish living etc., well I certainly do poke ridicule to the extravagances of some of that upper class, I reserve my disdain for something else. When those whom control of capital is bestowed, sometime rightfully as reward for their entrepreneurship, loose sight of the difference between investment in developing the productive capabilities of real life sustaining wealth, without which money of any form has no value, and the creation of DEBT bubbles that as attempts to monetize instruments of fictitious value commandeer the food from the infants mouth, that gets my heckles up. Kill people for financial aggrandizements, not the American way! Please entertain that this could be the theme that we use when engaging our fellow common man. The concept of value is on the table. We need to be clear about how we measure it, how we gauge it in comparison, and what is it that we esteem that we render value to a thing. Consider the following language usage and how the average Joe would make sense of it.

The (Merchant) banking (Investment) crowd on wall street lost their shirt in a gamble, the government bailed them out. It was made to seam that if they did not get a bailout we would have a disaster for our nations economy (Credit Freeze). One angle on this was that peoples fear of loosing their 401k assets were incited and and a freeze up of local commercial (Main Street, S&L) banking loomed. The pathway offered to avert this was to bail out the big guys, was this pathway the only possible pathway to avert the contrived consequences? Would we be better off if the parasites did not get the bailout? Let’s be clear about what occurred, one set of failed promissory notes were replaced with another set of promissory notes. Put it another way, the nominal monetary value (negotiable) of a financial instrument holding ownership of debt obligation (income stream) defaulted (ability or willingness of debtor to pay, ceased) was retried and substituted with the creation and extension of a new financial instrument representing ownership of the income stream (future value) derived from public coffers which is just as unpayable (in the medium to long term) as the first debt and just as negotiable (or un-negotiable I should say) for monetary value (can be discounted). So, what has changed? We now have more useless debt than before, useless because it does not set in motion the creation of a physical profit. This is a precise recipe for hyperinflation.

How close can the average Joe come to stating a correct definition of Capitalism, probably not very close at all. My hunch is most are in the dark about it. For Joe’s sake lets say there are two kinds of Capitalism, both involve risk and both involve reward just like the metaphor of the Farmer and the Train Robber. One kind of risk we want to encourage, the rewards impact many and challenges confront us as well, the good kind and risks are shared with consent. Another kind of risk is not encouraged as only a few gain from the exploitation of many. Often the rewards reaped are empty (of questionable value) and corrupting and the challenges brought to bear on people are not of the kind that bring out the best in them. Please team up with me to help Average Joe wise up and learn the things he needs to know. Below is a list of topics that I am inviting comments for.

  • Proper definition of Value and other topics of definition
  • events since HBO’s airing of Too Big To Fail
  • events since TARP’s inception
  • events within the HBO episode
  • events leading up to 2008 mayhem from 1999
  • events prior to 1999

Definition of Value

Farmers raise produce and stock of many varieties with intention for surplus that they can trade (profit). Some people, hopefully most, that are not farmers still do productive work and want a share in the common productivity by means of exchange (money). All who labor have value attributed to their labor on the basis of what it does for them, that is as close to a constant as you can get. The value of the Means of Exchange can change and the value of Movable (useful) Commodities can change. So we have three things of value (nouns) but we are more interested in the relationship between these things (verbs). Since one term in each the three ratios can change all values of relationship change! This is very much like Ohm’s Law but not not exactly. I have value to my own labor as it is and its relationship to other things, my production and the potential surplus above what I need and can consume, whether it be raw material, finish product, art/science/facility, farm production/food. My labor relates to the value of the means of exchange as means of exchange relates to the value of the commodities it can make access. My labor relates to the value of my commodities at hand as commodities at hand relate to the means of exchange they can make access. In a community where means of exchange are unnecessary these extended ratio relationships do not exist.

Now we declare that (money) the means of exchange has NO INTRINSIC value in and of itself, the commodities however retain their value relative to their usefulness to support life! Money only has value in it’s relation to labor or commodity that has readiness to be exchanged. There are examples of availability of money being different along the lines of trade where the values relative to the commodity in transport changed according to means of exchange accessibility, as with the Colonial American tokens engraved “value me as you please”. The commodity/labor ratio remained somewhat constant along the transportation path as the commodity was cash cheep at the source but dear at its destination, money could buy more further away from the hub of commerce. Transportation costs were factored in to pricing by location, so we see that means of exchange can have an additional value as a commodity. If transportation costs or money availability become universal these relationships disappear. It was this method of commerce combined with the impulse to internal improvements that was the American free enterprise/fair trade that protectionism sought to nurture and the perverted Free Trade of Adam Smith sought to destroy. The destructive side of Capitalism utilizes Financial Instruments as ownership of an income stream (debt payment) to commandeer away value in the accumulation of Monetary Instruments while making no facility to physical improvement. The Creative side of Capitalism extends a credit for a share of the reward and the appropriate authority of oversight to build physical improvement thus compensating the contributors of labor and materials as they contribute or ahead of time of the benefit of the completed project.

Now in closing please read;

Benjamin Franklin

A Modest Enquiry into the Nature and Necessity of Paper Currency (1729)

http://www.historycarper.com/resources/twobf2/paper1.htm

Robert Scheer: Access Journalism: The Movie – News Topics …
There is scant reference to the obliteration of the Glass-Steagall Act, a repeal
that permitted the too-big-to-fail merger of companies such as Travelers …

http://www.youaskabout.com/news/2011/05/25/robert-scheer-access-journalism-the-movie/

POPVOX

Look here on POPVOX for Stats and Status of H.R. 1489

https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr1489/report#nation